Email marketing

Open rate

Open rate is the share of delivered emails recorded as opened. It is measured by a hidden image, which is why the number no longer means what its name says.

Also called opens, unique open rate

SiiteWritten by SiiteUpdated September 5, 2026

Open rate is the share of delivered emails recorded as having been opened. It is the number most email platforms put at the top of the report, and it is the number people quote when they say a send went well. It is also, since 2021, a measurement of something other than what its name describes.

In short

  • An open is recorded when a hidden image loads, nothing more.
  • Apple Mail loads that image for people who never opened the message.
  • Clicks measured against delivered messages are the honest replacement.
  • It still detects a delivery failure, which is worth keeping it for.

How an open is counted

Everything strange about this metric follows from the mechanism, so it is worth knowing exactly what happens.

Every marketing email carries a tracking image about one pixel across, invisible against the background. The image lives on the sending platform’s server. When a mail app displays the message and fetches that image, the platform notes that the message with that address attached has been opened.

That is the entire method. Email has no channel back to the sender and no way of knowing whether a human was present. Two consequences follow immediately, and they point in opposite directions. Someone who reads every word in an app that blocks images is never counted at all. Anything that loads images without a person being involved is counted as a reader.

What Apple changed

The second of those consequences stopped being an edge case in 2021.

Apple introduced a privacy feature in Mail that recipients can switch on, and many did. It routes messages through Apple’s own servers and loads the remote images there, in advance, regardless of whether the person ever opens the message. The sender’s tracking pixel is one of those images. The open is recorded, timed to the moment Apple fetched it, from a location that is not the recipient’s.

So opens now arrive for people who did not open anything. How badly this affects your particular number depends on how much of your list reads mail on an iPhone, which is not something you chose and not something you can see. Two businesses sending identical emails to lists of the same size can report open rates that are not comparable, and neither of them is wrong.

There is a quieter casualty. Several platforms offer to send each person at the hour they usually open, and that recommendation is built from open timestamps. When a proportion of those timestamps record the moment a server fetched an image overnight, the best time to send is being calculated partly from machines. The feature is not useless, but it deserves less trust than the interface implies.

What to read instead

The replacement is not a new metric. It is one that was always better and was overshadowed by an easier one.

A click-through rate measured against messages delivered describes something a person decided to do. No privacy proxy manufactures a click, because clicking means loading a page and continuing a session. Below that sits the only measure that answers the question anybody actually asked, which is what those visitors went on to do: the conversion rate of the traffic, tracked by tagging the links so the visits are identifiable in analytics rather than filed as direct.

Click-to-open rate deserves a specific warning, because it is still shown prominently. It divides clicks by opens, and its denominator is now partly fictional, so it moves in response to your audience’s choice of phone.

The one thing it is still good for

Being unreliable is not the same as being empty, and there is a use worth keeping.

A sudden collapse is real information. Open rate does not usually fall by half because a subject line was poor, and rarely because the from name changed, though that is the one change worth ruling out first. It falls by half because messages stopped arriving in inboxes, and that makes it a rough early warning for a deliverability problem, which is worth catching within days rather than months.

The trap sits inside your own platform. Most email tools let you build a segment from people who opened recently, and that segment is now contaminated with addresses belonging to people who have never looked at anything you sent. If you use engagement to decide who still deserves mail, rebuild it around clicks. The audience gets smaller and stops lying to you.

Words you will hear

  • Unique opens. One count per recipient, not one per image load, which is the figure most reports show by default.
  • Total opens. Every load counted, including the same person twice.
  • Tracking pixel. The hidden image doing the measuring.
  • Machine opens. Opens generated by a proxy or a security scanner rather than by a person.
  • Click-to-open rate. Clicks divided by opens, now built on a denominator that cannot be trusted.
  • Engaged segment. A slice of the list defined by recent activity, and worth defining by clicks instead of opens.

Questions we get

More about open rate

How is an open actually measured?

By a tracking image roughly one pixel across, hidden in the message. When a mail app loads that image from the sender's server, the send is recorded as opened. There is no other mechanism. Email has no way of knowing that a human looked at anything.

Why did our open rate jump without us changing anything?

Almost always because of who is on the list rather than what you wrote. Apple Mail's privacy feature loads images automatically, so those recipients register as opens whether or not they looked. A shift in how much of your list reads in Apple Mail moves the number on its own.

Is open rate completely useless now?

No, it is unreliable rather than meaningless. It still works for comparing your own recent sends against each other, and a sudden collapse to near zero is a genuine warning sign. What it cannot do any more is tell you how many people read your email.

What should we look at instead?

Clicks measured against messages delivered, and what those clicks went on to do on your website. A click requires a decision by a person. Nothing in the current privacy arrangements manufactures one, which is why it is now the first honest number in the report.

What is click-to-open rate and can we still use it?

Clicks divided by opens, which used to describe how compelling the content was for people who looked. Its denominator now includes recipients who never looked, so the figure moves for reasons that have nothing to do with the email. Treat it with suspicion.

Our platform segments by engagement. Does this affect that?

Yes, and it is the least obvious consequence. A segment defined as opened in the last ninety days now contains people who have never seen a message from you. Rebuilding those segments around clicks gives a smaller, considerably more honest audience.

Does a low open rate mean our subject lines are weak?

Not on its own. Deliverability, sending time, list age and the mix of mail apps all move it. A subject line test is only meaningful between two groups drawn from the same list at the same moment, and even then the result deserves less confidence than it used to.
Want this handled for you?

Let us take open rate off your desk.

The guides and these pages are yours to use for nothing. When you would rather have the work done properly than done by you, tell us what is already in place and we will put a proposal together.